pasteraqua.blogg.se

Nas vs external hard drive as a data store for a server
Nas vs external hard drive as a data store for a server





  1. #Nas vs external hard drive as a data store for a server free#
  2. #Nas vs external hard drive as a data store for a server windows#

  • To access files stored on an external hard drive, you must have physical contact with it.
  • But you need to know that most of the external drives enjoy great portability.Īs a result, if you need to take the data with you or if you don’t have power supply or have no/poor internet, you should choose an external drive. Of course, there are some external hard drives that have big size and need power source (instead of computer USB port). Besides, both the power supply and router are necessary for the normal working of NAS.

    nas vs external hard drive as a data store for a server

    Yet, the NAS is always made up of boxes, which are often placed in a permanent position.Besides, neither internet connectivity nor power supply is required. The external drives are so compact that it can be carried around everywhere in your backpack, even pocket.

    nas vs external hard drive as a data store for a server nas vs external hard drive as a data store for a server

  • In general, the external hard drive is equipped with small size.
  • Here, in the following content, I’ll compare them in mainly 4 aspects. What are the differences between them? The most obvious differences may be: NAS is more flexible and offers more features when compared to external drive it is regarded as a hard drive with a brain.īefore you finally decide to purchase an external hard drive or spend cash for some of the best NAS for home use, you’d better read the comparison of NAS hard drive and external hard drive. This would provide an alternative to the Rclone approach and is much simpler to implement (no offense to u/johnerp ) just thought this might be another option.Though NAS and external hard drive can be both used to keep documents, videos, and other types of data, they are not the same. If anyone is willing to try this, I would be interested to hear if it works for you. I personally don't use it with any backup provider that has the "local attached drive" requirement, so I can't say it this approach will work. The second "junction link" becomes the pointer to the network share and is completely transparent to any application.
  • mklink /J "C:\MyJunctionLinks\JunctionLink_1" " C:\MySymbolicLinks\SymbolicLink_1".
  • mklink /D " C:\MySymbolicLinks\SymbolicLink_1" "\\NetworkServer\NetworkShare_1" (requires elevated privileges to execute).
  • mklink /J "C:\MyJunctionPoints\JunctionLink1" " C:\MyJunctionPoints\SharedLink1 "Įdit below: Renamed the folders and files in example, to make it easier to understand and follow the logic.
  • mklink /D " C:\MyJunctionPoints\SharedLink1 " "\\NetworkServer\NetworkShare1" (requires elevated privileges to execute).
  • In order to make a directory junction (using /J) on a network drive (what we want as the end result here), we need to first create a directory (/D) symbolic link and then create a junction off of that, like so:

    #Nas vs external hard drive as a data store for a server windows#

    Why couldn't you just use "mklink" command in Windows to point to your network share and create a junction link. I'd be interested in hearing if anyone is using this approach to backup their NAS or linux disks to an affordable online backup provider. The X: drive then appears as a local disk and not a network share. I used the mount arguments from the above post, and switched out "gdrive:" with "local:\\fileserver\linuxisos". I've tested this with one of the popular online backup providers and it works well.Ĭreate a local remote in Rclone (I called my local), then mount (with the UNC path). You know all those affordable cloud backup providers that only work with Windows, which you can't use with your NAS as they only support locally attached drives? Well with Rclone you can mount your NAS SMB share as a 'local disk'. Sorry to all if this is obvious.Ok, so I completely overlooked the significance of this until I experimented with Rclone on a windows VM to mount GDrive (thanks to this post ) Just make sure to tag the post with the flair and give a little background info/context. On Fridays we'll allow posts that don't normally fit in the usual data-hoarding theme, including posts that would usually be removed by rule 4: “No memes or 'look at this '”

    nas vs external hard drive as a data store for a server

  • We are not your personal archival army.
  • No unapproved sale threads or advertisement posts.
  • #Nas vs external hard drive as a data store for a server free#

    No memes or 'look at this old storage medium/ connection speed/purchase' (except on Free Post Fridays).Search the Internet, this subreddit and our wiki before posting.And we're trying really hard not to forget.ģ.3v Pin Reset Directions :D / Alt Imgur link Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Timetm). government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data - legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g.







    Nas vs external hard drive as a data store for a server